Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ali Massoudifar; Nozhan Alimi; Ainaz Boostan; Atoosa Etezadi; Ezzatalsadat Haji Seid Javadi; Misa Naghdipour Mirsadeghi
Volume 8, Issue 6 , November and December 2023, , Pages 549-555
Abstract
Background & Objective: Because childbirth is a natural process, pain is therefore part of the process. The amount of labor pain is probably directly related to the pregnant woman's mood, familiarity, awareness and self-confidence. Therefore, it is illogical to accept the complications of surgery ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Because childbirth is a natural process, pain is therefore part of the process. The amount of labor pain is probably directly related to the pregnant woman's mood, familiarity, awareness and self-confidence. Therefore, it is illogical to accept the complications of surgery and anesthesia and harm to the baby in order to escape the pain. Therefore, the aim of current study was investigating the relationship between the perception of labor pain and the number of deliveries.Materials & Methods: This study is descriptive-analytical correlational study. Two questionnaires were used for gathering information: one on personality traits and the other on labor pain. One hundred participants were chosen according to their demographic information, from a pool of pregnant women at maternal ward of the Persian Gulf Hospital in Bandar Abbas City, Iran. The data was analyzed by means of descriptive_ analytical measures such as Pearson Factor.Results: The mean age of women was 27.15±4.6. Collected data showed that 31% of women were gravida 1, 33% gravida 2, 15% gravida 3, 10% gravida 4, 5% gravida 5, 4% gravida 6, and 2% were gravida 7. a significant relationship was found between pain in the first delivery and pain in the second, third, fifth and sixth deliveries, so that the pain in the first delivery was more than the pain in the second, third, fifth and sixth deliveries.Conclusion: According to the results of this study the severity of labor pain in primiparous and multiparous women was not statistically significant and the intensity of reported pain level was high in all mothers.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Fereshteh Fakour; Roya Kaboodmehri; Amirhossein Hajizadeh Fallah; Maryam Dourandeesh; Fatemeh Gholamalipour; Seyedeh Maryam Attari; Forozan Milani; Zahra Pourhabibi
Volume 8, Issue 3 , May and June 2023, , Pages 217-222
Abstract
Background & Objective: Most pain relief methods are associated with some side effects and limitations. Magnesium sulfate, due to its osmotic properties and absorption of cervical water (moisture) can shorten labor duration and decrease labor pain via improving effacement and cervical edema. ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Most pain relief methods are associated with some side effects and limitations. Magnesium sulfate, due to its osmotic properties and absorption of cervical water (moisture) can shorten labor duration and decrease labor pain via improving effacement and cervical edema. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of intravaginal magnesium sulfate on pain severity and duration of the first and second stages of labor.Materials & Methods: In this double-blind randomized clinical trial study, 70 nulliparous women were allocated into two groups after the beginning of the active phase of labor. In group 1, 10 ccs of magnesium sulfate 50% was poured on the whole cervix during the vaginal examination. In group 2, a placebo (sterile water) in a similar way and amount was used. Then the two groups were compared in variables of demographic, obstetrics, clinical, pain severity, duration of the first and second stages of labor, and maternal and neonatal outcomes.Results: In different dilatations, pain severity in group 1 was significantly lower (P=0.0001). The duration of the first and second stages of labor was shorter in group 1 (P =0.0001). The two groups were similar in neonatal outcomes, drug side effects, and treatment satisfaction (P >0.05).Conclusion: Intravaginal magnesium sulfate improves the condition of the cervix, reduces the duration and the severity of labor pain, and has no medical or neonatal side effects.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Misa Naghdipour Mirsadeghi; Zahra Hamidi Madani; Aynaz Boostan; Ali Massoudifar
Volume 7, Issue 6 , September and October 2022, , Pages 543-547
Abstract
Background & Objective: Although giving birth is quite a natural process in a woman's life; it is very painful. Different people, however, experience this pain on different levels. In fact, one's perception of labor pain is determined by physiological, cultural, social, mental, and psychological ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Although giving birth is quite a natural process in a woman's life; it is very painful. Different people, however, experience this pain on different levels. In fact, one's perception of labor pain is determined by physiological, cultural, social, mental, and psychological factors. The present study aims to investigate the relationship between personality traits and one's perception of labor pain.Materials & Methods: This study is a descriptive-analytical correlational study. Two questionnaires were used for Gathering information: one on personality traits and the other on labor pain. One hundred participants were chosen according to their demographic information from a pool of pregnant women at the Persian Gulf Hospital maternity ward in Bandar Abbas City. The data was analyzed using descriptive and analytical measures such as the Pearson Factor.Results: Meaningful positive relationship between labor pain and Neuroticism (P < /i>=0.000, r=0.448), Openness (P < /i>=0.000, r=0.517) and Agreeableness (P < /i>=0.003, r=0.296). While Consciousness (P < /i>=0.047, r=-0.199) is found to have a meaningful negative relationship, extraversion shows no correlation with labor pain. Conclusion: Good Childbirth Counseling and proper training, based explicitly on a mother's personality traits, could significantly help provide an enjoyable childbirth experience and reduce the unnecessary demand for C-section operations.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Shahnaz Ahmadi; Katayoon Farahani; Majid Aklamli; Kambiz Ahmadi; Niloufar Beheshti
Volume 7, Issue 3 , January and February 2022, , Pages 186-191
Abstract
Background & Objective: Spinal analgesia and Entonox analgesia are used as pain relief methods during labor. This cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the effect of spinal analgesia and Entonox analgesia on the duration of the first, second, and third stages of labor, Apgar score, and ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Spinal analgesia and Entonox analgesia are used as pain relief methods during labor. This cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the effect of spinal analgesia and Entonox analgesia on the duration of the first, second, and third stages of labor, Apgar score, and maternal and fetal outcomes.Materials & Methods: Clinical information of 1,000 patients who delivered at Shahid Akbarabadi Hospital and underwent painless delivery with Entonox gas and spinal anesthesia was assessed; then, according to the inclusion criteria, 280 cases were divided into two groups: the spinal analgesia group (n=140) and Entonox analgesia group (n=140). In the spinal analgesia group, 25 μg of fentanyl and 1-2 mg of bupivacaine were administered. For the Entonox group, Entonox inhalation was administered via a face mask at the initiation of pain at each contraction. The duration of labor, mode of delivery, side effects, and maternal satisfaction were also compared in the two groups.Results: The duration of the first stage was significantly shorter in the spinal analgesia group than in the Entonox analgesia group (P < /em><0.001), but the duration of the second stage in the spinal analgesia group was longer (P < /em><0.001). There were no significant differences in the cesarean section rates, Apgar score, weight, and acidity (PH) and the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2) between the two groups. Measured pain was significantly lower in the spinal analgesia group (P < /em>=0.01) than in the Entonox analgesia group regarding visual analog scale (VAS) scores.Conclusion: Spinal analgesia is a safe, suitable, and effective method for pain reduction with no adverse effects on the outcome of labor compared to Entonox analgesia.
