Obstetrics and Gynecology
Minoo Yaghmaei; Ladan Ajori; Mojgan Mokhtari
Volume 9, Issue 1 , January and February 2024, , Pages 95-101
Abstract
Background & Objective: Although the safety of cesarean sections has increased, there are still considerations, especially for women with a history of repeated cesarean sections. This study was conducted with the aim of investigating maternal and neonatal outcomes in candidates for cesarean ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Although the safety of cesarean sections has increased, there are still considerations, especially for women with a history of repeated cesarean sections. This study was conducted with the aim of investigating maternal and neonatal outcomes in candidates for cesarean sections due to repeat cesarean sections according to the number of previous cesarean sections.Materials & Methods: This prospective descriptive study was conducted from April 2020 to June 2022 at Taleghani Hospital. All candidates for cesarean sections due to repeated cesarean sections were included in the study. According to the number of previous cesarean sections, they were divided into three groups. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests. A P value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.Results: A total of 345 women were included in the study. The results of this study showed that these three groups were significantly different in terms of duration of surgery (P<0.001), abnormal placental adhesion (0.012), and the presence of intraperitoneal adhesions (P<0.001), but there was not a significant difference in terms of other maternal and neonatal outcomes (P<0.05).Conclusion: The results of this study showed that an increase in the number of previous cesarean sections does not increase most maternal and neonatal complications during a current cesarean section. Of course, it should be noted that the number of women with a history of three or more previous cesarean sections was small in this study, and for this reason, more studies are needed.
Gynecology Oncology
Behnaz Nouri; Sara Sarani; Maliheh Arab; Mina Bakhshali-Bakhtiari; Fereshte Sarbazi; Anita Karimi
Volume 7, Issue 4 , March and April 2022, , Pages 361-361
Abstract
CORRIGENDUM : In the version of this article initially published, the name of author Mina Bakhshali-Bakhtiari was incorrectly written as Mina Bakhtiari.[J. Obstet. Gynecol. Cancer Res. 2022;7(3):230-234] published article with the doi of http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/jogcr.7.3.230
Read More
CORRIGENDUM : In the version of this article initially published, the name of author Mina Bakhshali-Bakhtiari was incorrectly written as Mina Bakhtiari.[J. Obstet. Gynecol. Cancer Res. 2022;7(3):230-234] published article with the doi of http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/jogcr.7.3.230
Gynecology Oncology
Behnaz Nouri; Sara Sarani; Maliheh Arab; Mina Bakhtiari; Fereshte Sarbazi; Anita Karimi
Volume 7, Issue 3 , January and February 2022, , Pages 230-234
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Adnexal masses are among the most important neoplastic lesions observed in women. Considering different results of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for adnexal masses, this study compared the surgical consequences of laparoscopy and laparotomy of adnexal masses.Methods: This prospective ...
Read More
Background and Objectives: Adnexal masses are among the most important neoplastic lesions observed in women. Considering different results of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for adnexal masses, this study compared the surgical consequences of laparoscopy and laparotomy of adnexal masses.Methods: This prospective observational study was performed on females aged 10 to 75 years with adnexal mass referred to the gynecology clinic of Shohaday-e Tajrish Hospital (2019-2020) by convenience sampling. A total of 34 patients in the laparoscopy group and 29 patients in the laparotomy group were included in the study. SPSS 25 was used for data analysis.Results: The mean duration of surgery and anesthesia in laparoscopic patients was significantly more than in the laparotomy patients (P < /em><0.05). There were no significant differences between patients in the two groups in terms of complications during surgery (P < /em>=0.62). The mean of pre-discharge pain (based on scoring from 1 to 10) in laparoscopic patients was significantly lower than in the laparotomy group (3.5 ± 1.2 and 6.7 ± 1.0, respectively, P < /em><0.001). The mean length of hospital stay after surgery was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group compared with the laparotomy group (29 ± 9 hours and 44 ± 7 hours, respectively, P < /em><0.001).Conclusion: Although the use of laparoscopy in adnexal masses is associated with a longer duration of surgery and anesthesia, due to the shorter hospital stay, it can be concluded that the use of laparoscopy in adnexal masses is better than laparotomy.
