Farname Inc. in collaboration with Iranian Society of Gynecology Oncology

Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Arash Women’s Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background & Objective: We compared two different methods of visual inspection of the cervix, including Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) and Visual inspection of the cervix with Lugol's iodine (VILI) in terms of sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of pre-malignant cervical lesions in comparison to colposcopy guided biopsy.
Materials & Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total number of 200 women who were referred to the colposcopy clinic of Arash women’s hospital (Tehran, Iran) for cervical cancer screening, underwent VIA, VILI, and colposcopy guided biopsy during 2018-2019.
Results: The calculated sensitivity and specificity of VIA and VILI in this population were (100% and 69.5%) and (100% and 60%), respectively, whereas the sensitivity and specificity of both VIA and VILI tests in combination were 100% and 77.2%. The positive and negative predictive values were 32.7% and 100%, respectively, when combined form of VIA and VILI was applied in this population.
Conclusion: VIA and VILI alone or in combination could be used as screening tests to evaluate the presence of cervical cancer and in case of positive results, supplementary tests such as colposcopy guided biopsy could be performed for definite diagnosis.

Highlights

 VIA and VILI alone or in combination could be used as screening tests to evaluate the presence of cervical cancer and in case of positive results, supplementary tests such as colposcopy guided biopsy could be performed for definite diagnosis.

Keywords

Main Subjects

1. Shrestha AD, Neupane D, Vedsted P, Kallestrup P. Cervical cancer prevalence, incidence and mortality in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prevent. APJCP. 2018;19(2):319. [DOI:10.1111/ecc.13207] [PMID]
2. Bedell SL, Goldstein LS, Goldstein AR, Goldstein AT. Cervical cancer screening: past, present, and future. Sex Med Rev. 2020;8(1):28-37. [DOI:10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.09.005] [PMID]
3. Rady HA, Gaber Z, Agamia A, Melies M. A Study of Sensitivity of Visual Inspection of the Cervix with Acetic Acid in Cervical Cancer Screening. Indian J Gynecol Oncol. 2019;17(2):29. [DOI:10.1007/s40944-019-0272-7]
4. Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 157: cervical cancer screening and prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(1):e1-e20. [DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001263]
5. AieshaKhatun N, Gudi SN. A Comparative Study of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid and Papsmear in Screening Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Sch Int J Obstet Gynec. 2021;4(6):241-9.
6. Allameh T, Dehghan M. Comparison Between Pap smear, Colposcopy and Cervical Histopathology Findings in Patients with Atypical Glandular Cells Results in Pap Smears. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res (JOGCR). 2021;6(4):202-8. [DOI:10.30699/jogcr.6.4.202]
7. Srinivas V, Nishimura HM, Jayakrishna P, Krupp K, Madhivanan P, Madhunapantula SV. Evaluating the feasibility of utilizing Gynocular-triage-to-diagnose application with VIA (Visual inspection with Acetic acid) in community cervical cancer screening programs in rural Mysore, India. Indian J Cancer. 2021;58(3):409.
8. Sharma M, Farooqui S. Comparative Study of Visual Inspection of Cervix Using Acetic Acid and Lugol's Iodine with Papanicolaou's Smear for the Screening of Premalignant and Malignant Lesions of Cervix. Indian Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;10(2).
9. Catarino R, Schäfer S, Vassilakos P, Petignat P, Arbyn M. Accuracy of combinations of visual inspection using acetic acid or lugol iodine to detect cervical precancer: a meta‐analysis. BJOG. 2018;125(5):545-53. [DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.14783] [PMID]
10. Umuago IJ, Obiebi IP, Eze GU, Moeteke NS. Improving primary health care workers' knowledge of cervical cancer and visual inspection screening techniques through competency-based training: prospects for expanding coverage in developing countries. Int J Commun Med Public Health. 2020;7(5):8. [DOI:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20201960]
11. Sinha S, Singh V, Mishra B, Singh A. Comparing the efficacy of visual inspection of cervix with acetic acid and Lugol's iodine with Pap smear cytology in screening for cancer cervix. J Curr Res Scient Med. 2018;4(1):10. [DOI:10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_40_17]
12. Nayak PK, Mitra S, Agrawal S, Hussain N, Thakur P, Mishra B. Role of various screening techniques in detecting preinvasive lesions of the cervix among symptomatic women and women having unhealthy cervix. J Cancer Res Ther. 2021;17(1):180-5. [DOI:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_30_19] [PMID]
13. Satyanarayana L, Asthana S, Bhambani S, Sodhani P, Gupta S. A comparative study of cervical cancer screening methods in a rural community setting of North India. Indian J Cancer. 2014;51(2):124-8. [DOI:10.4103/0019-509X.138172] [PMID]
14. Qiao L, Li B, Long M, Wang X, Wang A, Zhang G. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid and with Lugol's iodine for cervical cancer screening: Meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(9):1313-25. [DOI:10.1111/jog.12732] [PMID]
15. Chen C, Yang Z, Li Z, Li L. Accuracy of several cervical screening strategies for early detection of cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. IJGC. 2012;22(6):908-21. [DOI:10.1097/IGC.0b013e318256e5e4] [PMID]
16. Fokom-Domgue J, Combescure C, Fokom-Defo V, Tebeu PM, Vassilakos P, Kengne AP, et al. Performance of alternative strategies for primary cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Bmj. 2015;351:h3084. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.h3084] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Sauvaget C, Fayette JM, Muwonge R, Wesley R, Sankaranarayanan R. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening. IJGO. 2011;113(1):14-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.012] [PMID]
18. Zhang Y, Ma J, Zhao F, Xiang X, Ma Z, Shi Y, et al. Three-year follow-up results of visual inspection with acetic acid/Lugol's iodine (VIA/VILI) used as an alternative screening method for cervical cancer in rural areas. Chin J Cancer. 2010;29(1):4-8. [DOI:10.5732/cjc.009.10687] [PMID]
19. Sankaranarayanan R, Basu P, Wesley RS, Mahe C, Keita N, Mbalawa CC, et al. Accuracy of visual screening for cervical neoplasia: Results from an IARC multicentre study in India and Africa. International journal of cancer. 2004;110(6):907-13. [DOI:10.1002/ijc.20190] [PMID]