Iranian Society of Gynecology Oncology


1 Radiology Department, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran

3 Genecology and Obstetrics Resident, Tehran University, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran


Background: Pre-eclampsia complicates 5% to 8% of all pregnancies and annual incidence of pre-eclampsia is about 5% of all pregnancies around the world and is a significant cause of both maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity if left untreated.
Objectives: According to previous studies, blood supply distribution within the uterus is not similar in central compared with lateral sites, thus site of implantation and the resulting location of the placenta are likely to have a profound effect on the pregnancy outcome.
Methods: The researchers conducted a case-control study over 1-year period at a referral obstetric hospital in the south of Tehran. Overall, 121 females with three degrees of pre-eclampsia were considered as cases and 258 females with normal pregnancy were the controls. The females were aged 20 to 40 years old and their gestational age was between 14 and 26 weeks.
Results: The researchers recorded the participants’ blood pressures and locations of placenta during this period with consideration of their past and present obstetric history as well as medical and familial history. As a result, pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia were more commonly associated with lateral placentation in the second trimester when compared with non-pre eclampsia pregnancies.
Discussion: This study suggests that placental location, which is easily assessed at middle trimester of pregnancy by routine screening ultrasonography, is an ideal predictive test for evaluating the risk of developing pre-eclampsia.


  1. Kuklina EV, Ayala C, Callaghan WM. Hypertensive disorders and severe obstetric morbidity in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(6):1299-306. [DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a45b25] [PMID]
  2. ACOG. Hypertension in Pregnancy (Report of the ACOG Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy). Obstetr Gynecol. 2013;122(5).
  3. World Health Organization Fact Sheet. 2012.World Health Organization.
  4. Maternal mortality in 2005: estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNIFPA and the World Bank. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.World Health Organization.
  5. Zhong Y, Tuuli M, Odibo AO. First-trimester assessment of placenta function and the prediction of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30(4):293-308. [DOI:10.1002/pd.2475] [PMID]
  6. Chhabra S, Yadav Y, Srujana D, Tyagi S, Kutchi I. Maternal neonatal outcome in relation to placental location, dimensions in early pregnancy. J Basic Clin Reprod Sci. 2013;2(2):105-9. [DOI:10.4103/2278-960X.118651]
  7. Kalanithi LEG, Illuzzi JL, Nossov VB, Frisbaek Y, Abdel-Razeq S, Copel JA, et al. Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Placental Location. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26(11):1481-9. [DOI:10.7863/jum.2007.26.11.1481] [PMID]
  8. Guiot C, Gaglioti P, Oberto M, Piccoli E, Rosato R, Todros T. Is threedimensional power Doppler ultrasound useful in the assessment of placental perfusion in normal and growth-restricted pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(2):171-6. [DOI:10.1002/uog.5212] [PMID]
  9. Belogolovkin V, Engel SM, Ferrara L, Eddleman KA, Stone JL. Does sonographic determination of placental location predict fetal birth weight in diamniotic-dichorionic twins?. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26(2):187-91. [DOI:10.7863/jum.2007.26.2.187] [PMID]
  10. Moore RJ, Strachan BK, Tyler DJ, Duncan KR, Baker PN, Worthington BS, et al. In utero perfusing fraction maps in normal and growth restricted pregnancy measured using IVIM echo-planar MRI. Placenta. 2000;21(7):726-32. [DOI:10.1053/plac.2000.0567] [PMID]
  11. Francis ST, Duncan KR, Moore RJ, Baker PN, Johnson IR, Gowland PA. Non-invasive mapping of placental perfusion. Lancet. 1998;351(9113):1397-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07089-X]
  12. Zia S. Placental location and pregnancy outcome. J Turk German Gynecol Assoc. 2013;14(4):190. [DOI:10.5152/jtgga.2013.92609] [PMID]
  13. Baby Center Preeclampsia Survey. 2014.Baby Center. 14. Myatt L. Role of placenta in preeclampsia. Endocrine. 2002;19(1):103-11. [DOI:10.1385/ENDO:19:1:103]
  14. Jodicke C, Maulik D, Singh P, Heitmann E, Maulik D. Role of ultrasound in pre-eclampsia. Minerva Ginecol. 2012;64(4):293-308.
  15. Gonser M, Tillack N, Pfeiffer KH, Mielke G. [Placental location and incidence of pre-eclampsia]. Ultraschall Med. 1996;17(5):236-8. [DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1003188] [PMID]
  16. Bhalerao AV, Kukarni S, Somalwar S. Lateral placentation by ultasonography: a simple predictor of preeclampsia. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae. 2013;5(2):68-71. [DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1227]
  17. Pai MV, Pillai J. Placental laterality by ultrasound-a simple yet reliable predictive test for preeclampsia. J Obstetr Gynecol India. 2005;55(5):431-3.
  18. Mergen H, Ivit H, Köksal A. Retrospective assessment of 173 patients diagnosed with preeclampsia (in-cluding eclampsia): A study of 6 years. Biomed Res. 2010;21(2).
  19. Patel A, Dabhadkar S, Taralekar V, Wagh G. Placental laterality and uterine artery resistance for prediction of preeclampsia. Indian J Appl Res. 2012:118-9. [DOI:10.15373/2249555X/NOV2012/44]
  20. Kofinas AD, Penry M, Swain M, Hatjis CG. Effect of placental laterality on uterine artery resistance and development of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(6 Pt1):1536-9. . [DOI:10.1016/0002-9378(89)90920-4]
  21. Kiondo P, Wamuyu-Maina G, Bimenya GS, Tumwesigye NM, Wandabwa J, Okong P. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia in Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. Trop Med Int Health. 2012;17(4):480-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02926.x] [PMID]
  22. Booth RT, Wood C, Beard RW, Gibson JR, Pinkerton JH. Significance of site of placental attachment in uterus. Br Med J. 1962;1(5294):1732-4. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.1.5294.1732] [PMID]
  23. Little WA, Friedman EA. Significance of the Placental Position. A Report from the Collaborative Study of Cerebral Palsy. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;23:804-9.