Farname Inc. in collaboration with Iranian Society of Gynecology Oncology

Authors

1 Biomedical Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Biomedical Engineering Department, New Sciences & Technologies Faculty, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Aims: The skin suture is one of the inseparable sections of all surgeries; therefore, using noninvasive methods could be very applicable. The skin stapler is one of the methods which is commonly used for skin and is fast. This is while it is risky and may lead to an infection and undesirable cosmetic results. The current study aimed to analyze the noninvasive Zipline™ suture and to compare it with the stapler.
Materials and Methods: This experimental study was conducted at the University of Isfahan and 15 operating room technicians who experienced all three methods of suturing were questioned. The noninvasive Zipline™ suture was structurally analyzed and tested for the power of skin protection and flexibility by tensioning. An artificial skin was tested and tensioned 1cm from each side and the space of the incision between the edges was measured.
Findings: The Zipline™ suture had a low incision edge space, a good cosmetic outcome, low pain, and low risks of developing an infection considering the viewpoints of those who voted. The structure of Zipline™ which was zigzag led to a high rate of flexibility from one side and created more strength from another side.
Conclusion: A high strength rate and installation speed of this noninvasive suture (Zipline™) which can be used in many operations and substitute for invasive sutures. It should be considered that the Zipline™ suture can only be used for the skin and the suture of dermal tissue should be tightly done before using in surgeries.

Keywords

  1. Binkley M, Albrecht MJ, Srikumaran U. Noninvasive device helps with elective, traumatic shoulder incision closure [Internet]. Thorofare: Orthopedics Today; 2017 [cited 2017 June 15]. Available from: https://www.healio.com/orthopedics/shoulderelbow/news/print/orthopedics-today/%7B71cda7edc14d-4898-bfc6-8f6a25bec230%7D/noninvasivedevice-helps-with-elective-raumatic-shoulder-incision-closure?page=3.
  2. Adams S, Stojkovic SG, Leveson SH. Needlestick injuries during surgical procedures: A multidisciplinary online study. Occup Med. 2010;60(2):139-44. [DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqp175] [PMID]
  3. Gorsulowsky DC, Talmor G. A novel noninvasive wound closure device as the final layer in skin losure. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(8):987-9. [DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000000399] [PMID]
  4. Ko JH, Yang IH, Ko MS, Kamolhuja E, Park KK. Do zip-type skin-closing devices show better wound status compared to conventional staple devices in total knee arthroplasty?. Int Wound J. 2017;14(1):250-4. [DOI:10.1111/iwj.12596] [PMID]
  5. Davis A, Vaughn M, Piraino J. Effect of surgical incision closure device on skin perfusion following total ankle arthroplasty. University of Florida Health Conference. Florida: University of Florida Health; 2017.
  6. Tanaka Y, Miyamoto T, Naito Y, Yoshitake S, Sasahara A, Miyaji K. Randomized study of a new noninvasive skin closure device for use after congenital heart operations. Ann of Thorac Surg. 2016;102(4):1368-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.072] [PMID]
  7. Foglar C, Dubois D. Alternative skin closure modality for high-risk patients: A case report. JBJS J Orthop Physician Assist. 2015;3(3):11-3. [DOI:10.2106/JBJS.JOPA.15.00076]
  8. Téot L, Bekara F, Herlin C, Fluieraru S. Control of the skin edge tension after resection: A new adjustable, adhesive medical device [Internet]. Montpellier: Medical-Surgical Department of Wounds and Scarring, Burns, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital; 2017 [cited 2017 March 15]. Available from: http://www.ziplinemedical.com.cn/pic/images/syd001/news_file/_g/001-20171024-183039.PDF.
  9. Carli AV, Spiro S, Barlow BT, Haas SB. Using a non-invasive secure skin closure following total knee arthroplasty leads to fewer wound complications and no patient home care visits compared to surgical staples. Knee. 2017;24(5):1221-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2017.07.007] [PMID]
  10. Levi K, Ichiryu K, Kefel P, Keller J, Grice J, Belson O, et al. Mechanics of wound closure: Emerging tape-based wound closure technology vs. traditional methods. Cureus. 2016;8(10):e827. [DOI:10.7759/cureus.827] [PMID]
  11. De Maria E. New skin closure system facilitates wound healing after cardiovascular implantable electronic device surgery. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(8):675-7. [DOI:10.12998/wjcc.v3.i8.675] [PMID]