Farname Inc. in collaboration with Iranian Society of Gynecology Oncology


1 Isfahan university of medical sciences,obstetrics and gynecology department, Isfahan, Iran

2 Isfahan university of medical sciences,ob & gyn department, Isfahan, Iran

3 Isfahan university of medical sciences, ob & gyn department, Isfahan, Iran

4 Head of Midwifery Sector of Isfahan Vice Chancellor of Treatment, Isfahan University of Medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran

5 ,School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran


Background: Due to the uncertainties of maternal and neonatal complications after delivery and the lack of similar studies in this regard, this study aimed to compare the maternal and fetal complications of vaginal birth after C-Section (VBAC), natural delivery and repeat Cesarean section in Isfahan province.
Method: In this one-year descriptive cross-sectional study, 49889 pregnant women who had the natural childbirth (29631 deliveries), elective repeat Cesarean section (20148 deliveries) and VBAC delivery (110 deliveries) were enrolled, then maternal and neonatal complications were compared in three groups.
Results: There was a significant difference between the three groups based on the maternal and neonatal outcome, Apgar scores in the first and fifth minutes after delivery and the need for resuscitation at birth (P <0.05). Neonatal outcome was better in natural delivery and then VBAC compared to repeat C-section, respectively. Maternal outcome was better in VBAC and then repeat C-section than the natural childbirth, Apgar scores in the first and fifth minute were better in VBAC, and later natural delivery than repeat C-section and resuscitation at birth demonstrated better results for natural delivery and then VBAC than repeat C-section.
Conclusion: Utilizing VBAC and natural delivery have better maternal and fetal outcomes compared to C-section along with being more satisfactory and safer.


  1. 1. Guise J-M, Denman MA, Emeis C, Marshall N, Walker M, Fu R, et al. Vaginal birth after Cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010;115(6):1267-78. 2. World HO. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2. 3. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PloS one. 2016;11(2): e0148343. 4. Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M. Prevalence and causes of Cesarean section in Iran: systematic review and meta-analysis. Iranian journal of public health. 2014;43(5):545. 5. Nigam A, Anand R, Jain N. Study of obstetric and fetal outcome of post caesarean pregnancy. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;4(1):215-8. 6. Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin# 54: vaginal birth after previous Cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:203-12. 7. MacDorman M, Declercq E, Menacker F. Recent trends and patterns in Cesarean and vaginal birth after Cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States. Clinics in perinatology. 2011;38(2):179-92. 8. Homer CS, Johnston R, Foureur MJ. Birth after caesarean section: changes over a nine-year period in one Australian state. Midwifery. 2011;27(2):165-9. 9. Black C, Kaye JA, Jick H. Cesarean delivery in the United Kingdom: time trends in the general practice research database. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2005;106(1):151-5. 10. Lydon-Rochelle MT, Cahill AG, Spong CY, editors. Birth after previous Cesarean delivery: short-term maternal outcomes. Semin Perinatol; 2010: Elsevier. 11. Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, Spong CY, Dashe J. Williams obstetrics, 24e: Mcgraw-hill; 2014. 12. Devkare V, Agarwal NV, Gayakwad N, Kamant S. Maternal and Fetal Outcome of VBAC after First Previous LSCS in A Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of Western India. Int J Curr Res Med Sci. 2017;3(7):8-17. 13. Nazari S, Tabatabayee Cm, Bagheri M, Sharifnia H. Prevalence And Some Maternal And Neonatal Outcomes Of Vaginal Delivery After Cesarean And Repeat Cesarean In A Hospital Repeated Bentolhoda Bojnoord. 2016. 14. Zweifler J, Garza A, Hughes S, Stanich MA, Hierholzer A, Lau M. Vaginal birth after Cesarean in California: before and after a change in guidelines. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2006;4(3):228-34. 15. Mirteymouri M, Ayati S, Pourali L, Mahmoodinia M, Mahmoodinia M. Evaluation of Maternal-Neonatal Outcomes in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Referred to Maternity of Academic Hospitals. Journal of family & reproductive health. 2016;10(4):206. 16. Durnwald CP, Mercer BM. Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2004;15(6):388-93. 17. Young CB, Liu S, Muraca GM, Sabr Y, Pressey T, Liston RM, et al. Mode of delivery after a previous Cesarean birth, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity. CMAJ. 2018;190(18):E556-E64. 18. Fobelets M, Beeckman K, Faron G, Daly D, Begley C, Putman K. Vaginal birth after caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery after one previous caesarean section: a cost-effectiveness analysis in four European countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):92. 19. Trojano G, Damiani GR, Olivieri C, Villa M, Malvasi A, Alfonso R, et al. VBAC: antenatal predictors of success. Acta Biomed. 2019;90(3):300-9. 20. Li YX, Bai Z, Long DJ, Wang HB, Wu YF, Reilly KH, et al. Predicting the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study in China. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e027807. 21. Abdelazim IA, Elbiaa AA, Al-Kadi M, Yehia AH, Sami Nusair BM, Faza MA. Maternal and obstetrical factors associated with a successful trial of vaginal birth after cesarean section. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2014;15(4):245-9. 22. Thapsamuthdechakorn A, Sekararithi R, Tongsong T. Factors Associated with Successful Trial of Labor after Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Pregnancy. 2018;2018:6140982. 23. Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, Marshall N, Walker M, Fu R, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1267-78. 24. Habak PJ, Kole M. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2021, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2021. 25. Hidalgo-Lopezosa P, Hidalgo-Maestre M. [Risk of uterine rupture in vaginal birth after cesarean: Systematic review]. Enferm Clin. 2017;27(1):28-39