Farname Inc. in collaboration with Iranian Society of Gynecology Oncology


1 Professor of Gynecology-Oncology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 MD, Internist, Imam Hossein hospital, Iran university of medical Sciences

3 MS.c of developmental biology, Science and Research University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

4 Asistant of Obstetrics & Gynecology,Imam Hossein Medical center ,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran,Iran

5 Department of Surgery,Imam Hossein Hospital,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran

6 Assistant Professor of Radiology, Imam Hossein Medical center ,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran,Iran

7 Obstetricion&Gynecologist,Fellowship of Laparoscopy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran,Iran


Introduction: Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is a very rare condition, diagnosed in 0.2-0.7 % of appendectomies. Pathophysiology of the neoplasm involves accumulation of large volume of mucin in appendiceal lumen, resulting in its obstructive dilation. Most epithelial tumors affecting appendix are of the mucinous type and are manifested by mucin accumulation within an inflamed appendix with fibrotic and hyalinized wall.
Case presentation:
A 29-year-old female presented with history of chronic and intermittent episodes of abdominal pain and a palpable mass in the right lower abdominal quadrant. Sonography showed a 58 mm mass anterior to the uterus and adjacent to the ovary, probably a uterine myoma. Laparotomy revealed normal uterus, and ovaries with a translucent mass originating from appendix and fixed to cecum. Pathologic examination of the mass was reported as low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm.
Conclusion: This is a rare case of appendiceal mucocele in a young female, mimicking pelvic mass, which was misinterpreted by sonography as gynecologic solid mass near uterus. Preoperative diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele is important due to the risk of concurrent GI and ovarian malignancy associated with the condition.
Keywords: Mucocele; Appendix; pseudomyxoma peritonei; low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm


  1. 1. Ramaswamy V. Pathology of mucinous appendiceal tumors and pseudomyxoma peritonei. 2016;7(2):258-67. 2. Padmanaban V, Morano WF, Gleeson E, Aggarwal A, Mapow BL, Stein DE, et al. Incidentally discovered low‐grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: a precursor to pseudomyxoma peritonei. 2016;4(12):1112. 3. Rangarajan M, Palanivelu C, Kavalakat AJ, Parthasarathi RJIJoG. Laparoscopic appendectomy for mucocele of the appendix: report of 8 cases. 2006;25(5):256. 4. Marudanayagam R, Williams GT, Rees BIJJog. Review of the pathological results of 2660 appendicectomy specimens. 2006;41(8):745-9. 5. Ruiz-Tovar J, Teruel DG, Castineiras VM, Dehesa AS, Quindos PL, Molina EMJWjos. Mucocele of the appendix. 2007;31(3):542-8. 6. Pickhardt PJ, Levy AD, Rohrmann Jr CA, Kende AIJR. Primary neoplasms of the appendix manifesting as acute appendicitis: CT findings with pathologic comparison. 2002;224(3):775-81. 7. García Lozano A, Vázquez Tarrago A, Castro García C, Richart Aznar J, Gómez Abril S, Martínez Abad M. [Mucocele of the appendix: Presentation of 31 cases]. Cirugia espanola. 2010;87(2):108-12. 8. Sugarbaker PJPJoS. Appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei, a distinct clinical entity with distinct treatments. 2007;79(9):618-28. 9. Sugarbaker PHJTCJ. Epithelial appendiceal neoplasms. 2009;15(3):225-35. 10. Misdraji J, Young RH, editors. Primary epithelial neoplasms and other epithelial lesions of the appendix (excluding carcinoid tumors). Seminars in diagnostic pathology; 2004: Elsevier. 11. Aguilar OJM, Andrade AM, Perez G, Collazos SS, Ruiz B, Vazquez MFC, et al. Giant Appendicular Mucinous Cystoadenoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature. 2016;2(1):001-3. 12. Narasingamoorthy L, Rajagopalan P, Subramaniam DJJoEoM, Sciences D. Primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of appendix: a rare case report. 2016;5(65):4678-80. 13. Lu I-T, Ko C-W, Chang C-S, Hou T-CJGe. Asymptomatic intussusception secondary to a giant appendiceal mucocele treated via a laparoscopic approach. 2009;70(5):1026-7. 14. Dhage-Ivatury S, Sugarbaker PHJJotACoS. Update on the surgical approach to mucocele of the appendix. 2006;202(4):680-4. 15. Lien W-C, Huang S-P, Chi C-L, Liu K-L, Lin M-T, Lai T-I, et al. Appendiceal outer diameter as an indicator for differentiating appendiceal mucocele from appendicitis. 2006;24(7):801-5. 16. Sasaki K, Ishida H, Komatsuda T, Suzuki T, Konno K, Ohtaka M, et al. Appendiceal mucocele: sonographic findings. 2003;28(1):0015-8. 17. Bennett GL, Tanpitukpongse TP, Macari M, Cho KC, Babb JSJAJoR. CT diagnosis of mucocele of the appendix in patients with acute appendicitis. 2009;192(3):W103-W10. 18. Karakaya K, Barut F, Emre AU, Ucan HB, Cakmak GK, Irkorucu O, et al. Appendiceal mucocele: case reports and review of current literature. 2008;14(14):2280. 19. Zanati SA, Martin JA, Baker JP, Streutker CJ, Marcon NEJGe. Colonoscopic diagnosis of mucocele of the appendix. 2005;62(3):452-6. 20. Saad EA, Elsamani EY, AbdElrahim WE, Elsiddig KE, Khalil EAJJoscr. Surgical treatment of mucocele of the appendix: a systematic review and case report. 2018;2018(6):rjy102. 21. Lorenzon L, De Dominicis C, Virgilio E, Balducci GJCR. The appropriate management of an appendiceal mucocele. 2015;2015:bcr2014209045. 22. Sun P, Jiang F, Sun H, Zhao X, Ma J, Li C, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for appendiceal intussusception caused by mucocele of the appendix: case report and review of the literature. 2020;11(1):102.