Farname Inc. in collaboration with Iranian Society of Gynecology Oncology

Authors

1 Professor of Gynecology-Oncology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2 Obstetrician & Gynecologist, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 MD, Internist, Imam Hossein hospital, Iran university of medical Sciences

4 MS.c of developmental biology, Science and Research University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

5 Fellowship of Laparoscopy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran,Iran

6 Department Obstetrics & Gynecology, university of Shahid beheshti , Mahdieh Hospital ,Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Cancer survivorship care tries to discover improved healthy lifestyles for cancer patients, rather than just managing the complications; thus, it seems necessary to identify the aspects associated with general well-being in order to design proper care, and confront difficulties that cancer survivors encounter such as anxiety, depression, cognitive dysfunction, weakness and fatigue, pain, sexual dysfunction, and sleep disorders (1-4). Cancer survivorship assessment from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines. survivorship, version 2.2020) is one of the most common and valid tools for measuring the quality of life in cancer survivors (3-6).
Gynecological cancer survivors have been growing, as a result of advancements in national cancer screening strategies, resulting in early-stage diagnosis, and cancer treatments developments; thus, general mortality to incidence ratios have been declined from 2000 to 2015, in Iran. However, lack of a valid documented assessment tool to measure their requirements for supportive care is detected (7). It seems indispensable to provide a translated adapted version of NCCN survivorship questionnaire, to offer the Iranian cancer care providers have the prospect in comparison and approaches in a transcultural framework. The present study proposed to represent a renovated double back translation to revise and culturally adapt the original English version of cancer survivors’ assessment questionnaire into the Persian version in order to achieve a reliable tool that meets the clinical research needs of Iranian researchers at the desired level. The aim was to develop a comprehensive scale that comprises all features of gynecologic cancer survivors` requirements in Iranian population, equivalent to NCCN guideline hypothetical concept.

Keywords

  1. 1. Bober SL, Carter J, Falk SJTjosm. Addressing female sexual function after cancer by internists and primary care providers. 2013;10:112-9. 2. Somashekhar SP, Ashwin KR. Management of Early Stage Cervical Cancer. Reviews on recent clinical trials. 2015;10(4):302-8. 3. Grover S, Hill-Kayser CE, Vachani C, Hampshire MK, DiLullo GA, Metz JMJGo. Patient reported late effects of gynecological cancer treatment. 2012;124(3):399-403. 4. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. National Cancer Policy Board. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005. 5. Nekhlyudov L, Ganz PA, Arora NK, Rowland JHJJoCO. Going beyond being lost in transition: a decade of progress in cancer survivorship. 2017;35(18):1978. 6. Nekhlyudov L, Snyder CJRfUtdc. Overview of cancer survivorship care for primary care and oncology providers. 2020. 7. Denlinger CS, Sanft T, Moslehi JJ, Overholser L, Armenian S, Baker KS, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Survivorship, Version 2.2020. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN. 2020;18(8):1016-23. 8. Truant TL, Fitch MI, O’Leary C, Stewart JJCONJ. Global perspectives on cancer survivorship: From lost in transition to leading into the future. 2017;27(3):287. 9. Rahmani A, Ferguson C, Jabarzadeh F, Mohammadpoorasl A, Moradi N, Pakpour V. Supportive care needs of Iranian cancer patients. Indian journal of palliative care. 2014;20(3):224-8. 10. Marcoux V, Chouinard M-C, Diadiou F, Dufour I, Hudon C. Screening tools to identify patients with complex health needs at risk of high use of health care services: A scoping review. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0188663-e. 11. Syse A, Geller B. A cross-cultural perspective on challenges facing comparative cancer survivorship research. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;2011:689025-. 12. Guidry JJ, Torrence W, Herbelin S. Closing the divide: Diverse populations and cancer survivorship. 2005;104(S11):2577-83. 13. Haryani H, Afiyanti Y, Besral B, Gayatri D, Wahidi KR, Pramiasti H, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the cancer survivors’ unmet needs measure among gynecological cancer patients in Indonesia. 2020;26(2):23-9.