Iranian Society of Gynecology Oncology

Document Type : Case Report Article

Authors

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Infertility, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Cesarean scars in pregnancy have become a worrisome obstetric problem. Furthermore, given the challenge of diagnosis in cases of low suspicion in the initial prenatal sonographic screening, there is still debate over the standard of management. According to rare reported cases, the most acceptable recommendation is still termination of pregnancy to decrease the chance of further maternal dreadful complications. A case of twin pregnancy had been terminated at gestational age of 34 weeks with a history of diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy. Since pregnancy at the site of a previous cesarean section is very rare, but due to the complications of this type of pregnancy, choosing a suitable clinical approach for these patients is desirable. This type of pregnancy can increase the value of antenatal care if it can be continued until the fetus is viable and its complications, including placenta accreta and bleeding, are managed.

Highlights

 Cesarean scars in pregnancy have become a worrisome obstetric problem. Furthermore, given the challenge of diagnosis in cases of low suspicion in the initial prenatal sonographic screening, there is still debate over the standard of management.

Keywords

Main Subjects

1. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):14-29. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.007] [PMID]
2. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, Tsymbal T, Pineda G, Arslan AA. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):44.e1-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.018] [PMID]
3. Birch Petersen K, Hoffmann E, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Nielsen HS. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):958-67. [DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.130] [PMID]
4. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, Vintzileos A, Viscarello R, Al-Khan A, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(3):346-53. [DOI:10.1002/uog.13426] [PMID]
5. Tamada S, Masuyama H, Maki J, Eguchi T, Mitsui T, Eto E, et al. Successful pregnancy located in a uterine cesarean scar: A case report. Case Rep Women's Health. 2017;14:8-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.crwh.2017.03.003] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Zosmer N, Fuller J, Shaikh H, Johns J, Ross JA. Natural history of early first‐trimester pregnancies implanted in Cesarean scars. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):367-75. [DOI:10.1002/uog.14775] [PMID]
7. Jungkman O, Anderson J. Importance of early detection of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. J Diagn Med Sonogr. 2015;31(5):318-21. [DOI:10.1177/8756479315597707]
8. Pędraszewski P, Wlaźlak E, Panek W, Surkont G. Cesarean scar pregnancy - a new challenge for obstetricians. J Ultrason. 2018;18(72):56-62. [DOI:10.15557/JoU.2018.0009] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Amoozegar H, Rahmati N, Naseri Z, Shah-Hamzehi s, vahedian m, Noori e, et al. The Role of lower uterine segment thickness to Prediction of Cesarean Scar Defects: two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound Vs. Intraoperative Findings. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2023.
10. Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(5):731-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.020] [PMID]
11. Yu H, Luo H, Zhao F, Liu X, Wang X. Successful selective reduction of a heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy in the second trimester: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):1-7. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-016-1171-x] [PMID] [PMCID]